LCA OF BAGS IN MATER-BI®

The environmental impact caused by the manufacture and disposal of bags in Mater-Bi® used by families for the collection of organic waste was assessed using life cycle analysis, taking paper and polyethylene bags as references. The assessment covered all phases of the life cycle, from the raw materials to the manufacture, to the disposal of the product, including transportation.

PHASES OF THE PRODUCTION CHAIN AND CONTENTS OF THE SYSTEM

PRODUCTS SELECTED
The analysis took into consideration bags used and disposed of in Switzerland. The reference products were selected on the basis of those currently on sale in the large-scale retail trade, in Switzerland.

Bags made of Mater-Bi® Paper bags Bags made of Polyethylene
Material Z-class Mater-Bi® Kraft paper HDPE
Country of origin PCL:USAmaize: FranceMater-Bi®: Italy Paper: Sweden
Bag: Switzerland
Granules:Malaysia
Bag: Malaysia
Disposal Composting Composting Incineration
Dimensions (mm) (220+220)x440 (240+105)x510 (180+360)x600
Weight (g) 9.15 59.6 7.04

 

CALCULATION MODELS
The analysis was made according to the "impact oriented" model (Heijings, 1992; BUWAL 1996), using categories of the ECO-Indicator model (Goedkoop, 1995). The calculations were made using Version 2.2 of the EMIS (Environmental Management and Information System) program. See the bottom of the page for a more detailed description of the categories considered. The analysis was carried out by an independent Swiss company, and certified in accordance with EN ISO 14040.

ENERGY CONTENT

Paper bags consume much more energy than the corresponding bags made of Mater-Bi® and of PE, because of the greater weight.

GREENHOUSE EFFECT


Bags made of Mater-Bi® make a significant contribution to reducing the greenhouse effect, because of their natural constituents.

OVERALL COMPARISON: MATER-BI®, PAPER AND POLYETHYLENE.

Bag made of Mater-Bi® compared with:
Environmental impact category bag made of PE paper bag bag made of PE, including incineration of the organic residue
Energy
+ +
0
+
Greenhouse effect
+
+
+ +
Acidification
+
0
+ +
Nutrification
+ +
0
+
Ozone formation
+ +
+
+ +
Toxicity in air
+
++
+ +
Toxicity in water
++
0
+
Salification
_
_ _
+ +
Waste produced
++
_ _
_

Legend:
(++) = much better
(+ ) = better
(0 ) = comparable
(- ) = worse
(--) = much worse

The life cycle analysis shows that bags made of Mater-Bi® clearly have a better environmental impact than paper bags, and are comparable with bags made of polyethylene incinerated alone after separation from the waste. However, experience of managing the composting process shows that complete separation of the plastic bag from the organic waste is not possible, as a significant quantity of non-separable organic material remains together with the plastic. This waste must be burnt together with the plastic. If we also consider this effect, the environmental impact of bags made of Mater-Bi® are clearly better than bags made of polyethylene.

Environmental impact categories considered in the analysis.

Energy: consumption of energy resources (oil, natural gas, etc.), assessed from the energy content of the resources necessary (MJ)
Greenhouse effect: temperature increase of the planet due to gas emissions (CO2 equivalents)
Acidification: potential damage to plants due to the emission of substances such as nitrogen and sulphur oxides (SO2-equivalents)
Nutrification: potential unbalancing of the water and of the soil due to the emission of substances that have a fertilising effect, such as nitrates and ammonia (PO4-equivalents)
Ozone formation: increase in the formation of ozone (summer smog) due to the emission of substances such as organic solvents and nitrogen oxides (C2H4 equivalents)
Toxicity in air: pollution of the atmosphere due to gas emissions
Toxicity in water: pollution of water due to organic emissions, heavy metals, etc.
Salification: damage to flora and fauna in water due to the emission of salts, such as chlorides (assessed as H+ ions)
Waste produced: quantity of waste disposed of, weighed as inert substances, harmful toxic waste, radioactive waste, etc.